Evidence library

Here we collect the claims behind our sessions and tools, with their levels of evidence. Each card states what we know, what we don't know and the wording we use in the app. "It doesn't work" and "the evidence is not yet sufficient" are different things. Evidence methodology · Guides

● A · Strong evidence
Several high-quality systematic reviews or randomised trials with consistent results.
◆ B · Moderate evidence
A few controlled studies or meta-analyses; reasonable but limited generalisability.
▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence
Small trials or pilot studies; inconsistent results.
■ D · Insufficient evidence
No clinical support; only laboratory findings, anecdotes or a single small study.
✦ T · Traditional/spiritual practice
No scientific claim is made; it is offered as a cultural or personal practice.
○ Soundscape, no claim
No health or mental-effect claim at all; it is simply a soundscape.

◆ B · Moderate evidence

◆ B · Moderate evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: Listening to binaural beats may reduce perceived pain.

What do we know?

Three meta-analyses report reduced perceived pain; pain-specific pooled effects are moderate (SMD −0.61 and −0.53). In surgical patients, pooling 5 trials showed lower postoperative pain, and pooling 4 theta-beat trials pointed the same way.

What don't we know?

Certainty is low: studies are small, heterogeneous and mostly done in clinical settings. Which beat frequency and listening time matter is unclear. A 2024 systematic review of 16 randomised trials rated the evidence as low to very low quality; most studies concerned acute pain, and evidence for chronic pain is insufficient.

Wording we use in the app: The product does not target pain; this summary appears only in the evidence library for education.

Sources (4)
  1. Garcia-Argibay ve ark. 2019 · Meta-analysis · 22 studies

    A meta-analysis of 22 studies on memory, attention, anxiety and pain found a medium, significant overall effect. Listening before the task (or before and during it) worked better than listening only during it, and longer exposure increased the effect. Masking with white or pink noise did not appear necessary.

    Overall g = 0.45 (35 effect sizes from 22 studies)

    First published online in 2018. The abstract gives no confidence interval. Its reference list includes a study retracted in 2021 (Colzato et al. 2017, PMID 28409319); the abstract does not show whether it was included in the analysis.

    Garcia-Argibay M, Santed MA, Reales JM. Efficacy of binaural auditory beats in cognition, anxiety, and pain perception: a meta-analysis. Psychol Res. 2019;83(2):357-372. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1066-8 PMID 30073406 Go to source

  2. Xiong ve ark. 2025 · Meta-analysis · 15 studies

    In a meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials in surgical patients, perioperative binaural beats were associated with lower anxiety and postoperative pain scores than blank audio. Heterogeneity between trials was very high; the authors call for standardized protocols and better trials.

    Versus blank audio: anxiety SMD −1.38 (95% CI −1.89 to −0.87; 14 trials; I² 91.6%); postoperative pain SMD −0.61 (95% CI −1.03 to −0.19; 5 trials; I² 75.8%)

    Xiong J, Jiang X, Cai B, Zhao L, Zhang Q, Luo J. Binaural beats for perioperative anxiety and pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2025;95:103299. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103299 PMID 41176178 Go to source

  3. Fatima ve ark. 2026 · Meta-analysis · 13 studies · 630 participants

    Of 13 randomized trials (630 participants) of theta (4-8 Hz) binaural beats, only pain could be pooled: binaural beats were associated with less pain than controls (low certainty by GRADE). Anxiety and cognition outcomes were measured too differently to pool.

    Pain SMD −0.53 (95% CI −0.84 to −0.23; 4 trials, n = 173; I² 0%)

    Fatima I, Zaidi S, Sundus H, Alam MF, Parveen H, Khan SA. Efficacy of theta binaural beat therapy on pain, cognition and anxiety in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Explore (NY). 2026;22(5):103471. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2026.103471 PMID 42349368 Go to source

  4. Shamsi ve ark. 2024 · Systematic review · 16 studies

    Sixteen randomised trials of binaural beats for acute and chronic pain in adults (13 acute, 3 chronic) were reviewed; no meta-analysis was done because the studies differed too much. Most had high risk of bias and the evidence quality was low to very low. The authors name alpha or delta-to-alpha tones as a possible option for acute pain and call for better studies on chronic pain.

    Shamsi F, Azadinia F, Shaygan M. Does brain entrainment using binaural auditory beats affect pain perception in acute and chronic pain?: a systematic review. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024;24(1):34. doi:10.1186/s12906-024-04339-y PMID 38216943 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

◆ B · Moderate evidence

Claim reviewed: Steady broadband noise (white, pink, brown) makes other ambient sounds less noticeable.

What do we know?

Auditory masking is an established psychoacoustic phenomenon: a steady sound raises the detection threshold of other sounds in similar frequency bands. This is why noise is used to cover ambient sounds.

What don't we know?

It is not clear that masking translates into protected sleep: in a 25-person lab study, adding pink noise to intermittent environmental noise worsened sleep structure further, and earplugs worked better. A systematic review warns that continuous noise may also affect hearing.

Wording we use in the app: Helps mask surrounding sounds.

Sources (3)
  1. Moore 2013 · Textbook

    A standard textbook of auditory perception. Its chapter on frequency selectivity and masking describes how one sound raises the detection threshold of another (auditory masking) and how this depends on frequency bands.

    6th edition.

    Moore BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Brill; 2013. ISBN 9789004252424 Go to source

  2. Basner ve ark. 2026 · Randomised controlled trial · 25 participants

    A seven-night laboratory study in 25 healthy adults: intermittent environmental noise mainly reduced deep sleep (N3), whereas pink noise mainly reduced REM sleep, and adding pink noise to environmental noise worsened sleep structure further. Earplugs prevented most environmental-noise effects. The authors caution against widespread, indiscriminate use of broadband noise.

    Pink noise alone (50 dBA) vs a quiet night: REM sleep −18.6 min (p = .0003)

    Basner M, Smith MG, Cordoza M, Kayser MS, Carlin M, Ecker AJ, et al. Efficacy of pink noise and earplugs for mitigating the effects of intermittent environmental noise exposure on sleep. Sleep. 2026;49(5):zsag001. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsag001 PMID 41627391 Go to source

  3. Riedy ve ark. 2021 · Systematic review · 38 studies

    Across 38 studies of continuous white or similar broadband noise and sleep, findings ranged from noise helping sleep to disrupting it. By GRADE, the quality of evidence that continuous noise benefits sleep was very low; the authors warn that continuous noise may also harm sleep and hearing.

    Riedy SM, Smith MG, Rocha S, Basner M. Noise as a sleep aid: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2021;55:101385. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101385 PMID 33007706 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

◆ B · Moderate evidence

Claim reviewed: Meditation practice may help reduce anxiety; evidence for stress is weaker.

What do we know?

In a meta-analysis of 47 randomized trials with active controls (3,515 people), mindfulness meditation programs showed small positive effects on anxiety, depression and pain with moderate-strength evidence; evidence for stress and distress was low.

What don't we know?

This evidence mostly comes from structured 8-week programs; whether listening to a sound session alone has the same effect is unknown. Participants came from diverse clinical populations. The programs were not shown to be better than drugs, exercise or other behavioral approaches, and NCCIH notes that much of the research is preliminary.

Wording we use in the app: Meditation programs have shown small positive effects on some anxiety measures, with moderate-strength evidence.

Sources (2)
  1. Goyal ve ark. 2014 · Meta-analysis · 47 studies · 3,515 participants

    In a meta-analysis of 47 randomized trials with active controls (3,515 participants), mindfulness meditation programs showed small positive effects on anxiety, depression and pain with moderate-strength evidence, and low-strength evidence for stress and distress. There was no evidence that the programs were better than drugs, exercise or other behavioral approaches. Participants came from diverse clinical populations.

    Versus active controls: anxiety effect size 0.38 (95% CI 0.12-0.64; week 8); pain 0.33 (95% CI 0.03-0.62)

    'Moderate' is the authors' strength-of-evidence grade (not GRADE) and applies to anxiety, depression and pain.

    Goyal M, Singh S, Sibinga EM, Gould NF, Rowland-Seymour A, Sharma R, et al. Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):357-368. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13018 PMID 24395196 Go to source

  2. NCCIH 2022 · Institutional page

    NCCIH notes that much meditation and mindfulness research has been preliminary or not rigorous and may have been interpreted too optimistically. For anxiety and stress, some analyses found mindfulness-based approaches better than no intervention, while short-term results varied between studies.

    The page shows 'Last Updated: June 2022'.

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH). Meditation and Mindfulness: Effectiveness and Safety. National Institutes of Health; 2022. Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

◆ B · Moderate evidence

Claim reviewed: Breathing slowed to about 6 breaths a minute increases the rest-related component of heart rate variability.

What do we know?

In a meta-analysis of 223 studies, voluntary slow breathing increased vagally mediated heart rate variability during breathing, immediately after a session and after multi-session programmes. Biofeedback training that teaches pacing to heart rhythm was also linked to a large reduction in self-reported stress and anxiety.

What don't we know?

The effect comes from slower breathing; no effect of the sound itself has been shown. Some studies used device-based biofeedback; whether pacing with sound alone gives the same result has not been tested separately. Any advantage of searching for a personal breathing rate is outside this claim.

Wording we use in the app: Guides your breathing down to about six breaths a minute; slow breathing can support a body response linked to relaxation.

Sources (2)
  1. Laborde ve ark. 2022 · Meta-analysis · 223 studies

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of 223 studies on voluntary slow breathing and heart rate variability. Vagally mediated heart rate variability increased during slow breathing, immediately after a single session and after multi-session programmes.

    Laborde S, Allen MS, Borges U, Dosseville F, Hosang TJ, Iskra M, Mosley E, Salvotti C, Spolverato L, Zammit N, Javelle F. Effects of voluntary slow breathing on heart rate and heart rate variability: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;138:104711. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104711 PMID 35623448 Go to source

  2. Goessl ve ark. 2017 · Meta-analysis · 24 studies · 484 participants

    A meta-analysis of 24 studies (484 participants) on heart rate variability biofeedback training: a large reduction in self-reported stress and anxiety (g = 0.83 against controls). The authors call for better-controlled studies.

    Between-groups g = 0.83

    Biofeedback paces breathing to heart rhythm measured by a device; it is not the same as pacing with sound alone.

    Goessl VC, Curtiss JE, Hofmann SG. The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback training on stress and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017;47(15):2578-2586. doi:10.1017/S0033291717001003 PMID 28478782 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

◆ B · Moderate evidence

Claim reviewed: Breathwork may help reduce self-reported stress.

What do we know?

In a meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials, breathwork was linked to a small-to-medium reduction in self-reported stress compared with non-breathwork controls (g = −0.35). Biofeedback-based breathing training also showed a large reduction in stress and anxiety.

What don't we know?

Most studies carry moderate risk of bias and the techniques vary widely; which technique works is unclear. Techniques with fast breathing or breath holding are outside this product's scope.

Wording we use in the app: A slow breathing break can accompany your stress-management routine.

Sources (2)
  1. Fincham ve ark. 2023 · Meta-analysis · 12 studies · 785 participants

    A meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing breathwork with non-breathwork controls: a small-to-medium reduction in self-reported stress (12 trials, 785 adults), with similar effects on secondary mental health measures. Most studies had moderate risk of bias; the authors urge caution so that hype and evidence are not confused.

    Self-reported stress: g = −0.35 (95% CI −0.55 to −0.14)

    One author declared a link with a foundation that teaches breathing techniques.

    Fincham GW, Strauss C, Montero-Marin J, Cavanagh K. Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):432. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27247-y PMID 36624160 Go to source

  2. Goessl ve ark. 2017 · Meta-analysis · 24 studies · 484 participants

    A meta-analysis of 24 studies (484 participants) on heart rate variability biofeedback training: a large reduction in self-reported stress and anxiety (g = 0.83 against controls). The authors call for better-controlled studies.

    Between-groups g = 0.83

    Biofeedback paces breathing to heart rhythm measured by a device; it is not the same as pacing with sound alone.

    Goessl VC, Curtiss JE, Hofmann SG. The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback training on stress and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017;47(15):2578-2586. doi:10.1017/S0033291717001003 PMID 28478782 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

◆ B · Moderate evidence

Claim reviewed: Listening to calm music before bed may improve subjective sleep quality.

What do we know?

A Cochrane review of 13 randomised trials in adults with sleep difficulties found that 25-60 minutes of music a day improved subjective sleep quality with moderate certainty. A narrative review found the most effective music was slow (60-80 bpm), soft in melody, instrumental and simple, with 30-45 minutes suggested.

What don't we know?

No improvement in objective sleep measures was shown. The studies used prerecorded, human-made music; whether simple melodies generated on the device have the same effect has not been tested. Risk of bias is high because participants cannot be blinded to music.

Wording we use in the app: A slow, calm melody accompanies your bedtime routine; there is moderate-certainty evidence that listening to music can improve subjective sleep quality.

Sources (2)
  1. Jespersen ve ark. 2022 · Systematic review · 13 studies · 1,007 participants

    A Cochrane review of 13 randomised trials (1007 participants) of music listening in adults with sleep difficulties. Listening to prerecorded music for 25-60 minutes a day improved subjective sleep quality compared with no intervention, with moderate certainty. Low-certainty benefits were found for sleep-onset latency, total sleep time and sleep efficiency; three studies with objective measures suggest music may not improve these. No adverse events were reported.

    Sleep quality (PSQI): mean difference −2.79 (95% CI −3.86 to −1.72), 10 studies, 708 participants

    All studies have high risk of performance bias because participants could not be blinded to music. The certainty rating applies to subjective sleep quality.

    Jespersen KV, Pando-Naude V, Koenig J, Jennum P, Vuust P. Listening to music for insomnia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;8(8):CD010459. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010459.pub3 PMID 36000763 Go to source

  2. Pan ve Wang 2025 · Review

    A narrative review drawing on randomised trials and meta-analyses: the most effective music was slow (60-80 bpm), soft and smooth in melody, instrumental and simple in structure. Suggested use is 30-45 minutes a day before bed at a comfortable volume. Long-term effects and mechanisms remain unclear.

    Pan EY, Wang W. Elements of music that work to improve sleep, a narrative review. Front Sleep. 2025;4:1707162. doi:10.3389/frsle.2025.1707162 PMID 41425167 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

◆ B · Moderate evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: Listening to music before a medical procedure may reduce pre-procedure anxiety.

What do we know?

An umbrella review combining 6 systematic reviews (40 primary studies) found that music before surgery significantly reduced anxiety, more so with 20 minutes or more of listening.

What don't we know?

The pre-procedure setting does not transfer directly to everyday use, and delivery details were often poorly reported. This product is not designed for medical procedures.

Wording we use in the app: Music listening has also been studied as a support for relaxation in clinical settings; this product is not designed for medical procedures.

Sources (1)
  1. Yang ve ark. 2025 · Systematic review

    An umbrella review of 6 systematic reviews (40 primary studies) of music for preoperative anxiety: the pooled result showed a significant reduction, more pronounced with sessions of 20 minutes or longer. Reporting of how music was delivered was often inadequate.

    Mean difference −5.20 (95% CI −6.32 to −4.07), I² = 49%

    Yang KL, Detroyer E, Niu MM, Hoogma DF, Tian JH, Rex S, Milisen K. Music intervention as a strategy to reduce preoperative anxiety: an umbrella review. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025;25(1):410. doi:10.1186/s12871-025-03120-z PMID 40836211 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence

Claim reviewed: Listening to binaural beats may reduce short-term anxiety and help relaxation.

What do we know?

Meta-analyses and pre-surgery trials report short-term reductions in anxiety; the effect against blank audio looks large, but heterogeneity between studies is very high. Of 12 randomized trials on stress, 8 reported a positive result on at least one measure and 4 found no difference. In a 2025 preoperative trial, anxiety fell slightly more in the binaural beat group than in an unstimulated control; it fell in both groups.

What don't we know?

Some controlled studies found no effect: in a surgical trial with 90 patients in Türkiye, binaural and isochronic groups did not differ from a no-sound group, and in an online study of 58 people, 40 Hz beats did not change a single-item anxiety rating. Randomization and blinding are unclear in most studies, and adverse effects are rarely studied.

Wording we use in the app: Some studies report short-term relaxation; results are inconsistent.

Sources (6)
  1. Garcia-Argibay ve ark. 2019 · Meta-analysis · 22 studies

    A meta-analysis of 22 studies on memory, attention, anxiety and pain found a medium, significant overall effect. Listening before the task (or before and during it) worked better than listening only during it, and longer exposure increased the effect. Masking with white or pink noise did not appear necessary.

    Overall g = 0.45 (35 effect sizes from 22 studies)

    First published online in 2018. The abstract gives no confidence interval. Its reference list includes a study retracted in 2021 (Colzato et al. 2017, PMID 28409319); the abstract does not show whether it was included in the analysis.

    Garcia-Argibay M, Santed MA, Reales JM. Efficacy of binaural auditory beats in cognition, anxiety, and pain perception: a meta-analysis. Psychol Res. 2019;83(2):357-372. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1066-8 PMID 30073406 Go to source

  2. Xiong ve ark. 2025 · Meta-analysis · 15 studies

    In a meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials in surgical patients, perioperative binaural beats were associated with lower anxiety and postoperative pain scores than blank audio. Heterogeneity between trials was very high; the authors call for standardized protocols and better trials.

    Versus blank audio: anxiety SMD −1.38 (95% CI −1.89 to −0.87; 14 trials; I² 91.6%); postoperative pain SMD −0.61 (95% CI −1.03 to −0.19; 5 trials; I² 75.8%)

    Xiong J, Jiang X, Cai B, Zhao L, Zhang Q, Luo J. Binaural beats for perioperative anxiety and pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2025;95:103299. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103299 PMID 41176178 Go to source

  3. Platt ve Hammond 2025 · Systematic review · 12 studies

    Of 12 randomized trials of binaural beats for stress, 8 reported at least one significant effect favouring binaural beats and 4 found none. Citing methodological heterogeneity and unclear randomisation and blinding, the authors concluded the evidence does not strongly support widespread recommendation and little is known about adverse effects.

    No pooled effect; 8 of 12 trials reported at least one significant effect, 4 found no group differences

    First published online in 2024. Not indexed in PubMed.

    Platt J, Hammond L. Is non-clinical, personal use of binaural beats audio an effective stress-management strategy? A systematic review of randomised control trials. Adv Ment Health. 2025;23(2):258-286. doi:10.1080/18387357.2024.2374759 Go to source

  4. Akkurt ve Ekici 2026 · Randomised controlled trial · 90 participants

    In 90 patients undergoing impacted lower third molar surgery in Türkiye, neither binaural beats nor isochronic tones reduced anxiety compared with no sound; only isolated physiological differences appeared. Of the patients who received sound, 78.3% said they would prefer it again in future procedures.

    No significant between-group differences in pre- or postoperative anxiety scores

    In press; no volume or pages yet.

    Akkurt O, Ekici Ö. Effect of binaural beats and isochronic tones on anxiety during impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2026.07.006 PMID 42471303 Go to source

  5. Leistiko ve ark. 2024 · Experiment · 58 participants

    In 58 healthy adults, 40 Hz (gamma) binaural beats did not change attention-test performance (reaction time, errors, attention networks) compared with a control tone, and had no effect on a single-item self-rating of anxiety.

    No significant difference from a control tone in attention measures or self-rated anxiety

    First published online in 2023. Within-subject crossover with randomized order.

    Leistiko NM, Madanat L, Yeung WKA, Stone JM. Effects of gamma frequency binaural beats on attention and anxiety. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(6):5032-5039. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04681-3 PMID 37359672 Go to source

  6. Ostertag ve ark. 2025 · Randomised controlled trial

    In patients awaiting planned surgery, state anxiety fell slightly more in the group that listened to binaural beats before surgery than in the unstimulated control group (mean relative difference 6 percentage points, p = 0.045); anxiety fell in both groups. Alpha power did not differ between groups.

    Online ahead of print; no volume or pages yet. The authors suggest other comparisons, such as monaural beats, to see whether the effect goes beyond listening to music.

    Ostertag J, Zinn S, Georgii MT, Niederle MB, Pinto Campos C, Schneider G, Hayden O, Kratzer S, Kreuzer M. Binaural beat stimulation as a tool to reduce preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective surgery and general anesthesia - results from a randomized controlled trial. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2025. doi:10.1088/2057-1976/adfa9d PMID 40795897 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence

Claim reviewed: Listening to binaural beats may support focus, attention and memory.

What do we know?

Two meta-analyses found a moderate overall effect: one on memory and attention only (g = 0.40), the other also pooling anxiety and pain (g = 0.45); they partly share studies. In a small parametric study, 40 Hz beats with a low (340 Hz) carrier and a white-noise background improved general attention but did not prevent attention from declining over time.

What don't we know?

Results conflict. In two home experiments with 1,000 people in total, 5 Hz and 15 Hz beats lowered reasoning-test scores, while silence and other sounds had no effect. In a 58-person study, 40 Hz beats did not affect attention. Positive findings need replication. In a three-experiment study, 16 Hz binaural beats did not improve sustained attention; the combined data gave evidence against this hypothesis.

Wording we use in the app: Evidence is weak and conflicting; in some studies binaural beats lowered test performance.

Sources (6)
  1. Garcia-Argibay ve ark. 2019 · Meta-analysis · 22 studies

    A meta-analysis of 22 studies on memory, attention, anxiety and pain found a medium, significant overall effect. Listening before the task (or before and during it) worked better than listening only during it, and longer exposure increased the effect. Masking with white or pink noise did not appear necessary.

    Overall g = 0.45 (35 effect sizes from 22 studies)

    First published online in 2018. The abstract gives no confidence interval. Its reference list includes a study retracted in 2021 (Colzato et al. 2017, PMID 28409319); the abstract does not show whether it was included in the analysis.

    Garcia-Argibay M, Santed MA, Reales JM. Efficacy of binaural auditory beats in cognition, anxiety, and pain perception: a meta-analysis. Psychol Res. 2019;83(2):357-372. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1066-8 PMID 30073406 Go to source

  2. Basu ve Banerjee 2023 · Meta-analysis · 15 studies

    A meta-analysis of 15 studies found a medium, significant overall effect of binaural beats on memory and attention. The systematic review found conflicting results, especially for theta and beta beats on memory and attention tasks; the authors call for more robust designs.

    Overall g = 0.40 (31 effect sizes from 15 studies)

    First published online in 2022.

    Basu S, Banerjee B. Potential of binaural beats intervention for improving memory and attention: insights from meta-analysis and systematic review. Psychol Res. 2023;87(4):951-963. doi:10.1007/s00426-022-01706-7 PMID 35842538 Go to source

  3. Melnichuk ve ark. 2025 · Experiment · 80 participants

    Sixteen parameter conditions were tested; 80 undergraduates were randomized and 64 analysed. 40 Hz binaural beats with a low (340 Hz) carrier improved general attention performance but did not prevent the decline of attention over time. EEG showed a response at the beat frequency that varied with parameters and weakened under white-noise masking. The authors say the finding needs replication.

    Higher hit rate than a pure tone for 40 Hz beats with a 340 Hz carrier (p = 0.002); no effect on the vigilance decrement

    Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW. A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):4308. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z PMID 39910150 Go to source

  4. Klichowski ve ark. 2023 · Experiment · 1,000 participants

    In two online home experiments, 1,000 adults took a reasoning test. Listening to binaural beats during the second half lowered scores regardless of how the sound was framed, while silence and other sounds had no effect. The authors concluded that home-use binaural beats may weaken rather than support cognitive performance.

    About 5-7% lower reasoning-test scores during 5 Hz and 15 Hz binaural beats (second experiment); silence, classical music and a pure tone had no effect

    Klichowski M, Wicher A, Kruszwicka A, Golebiewski R. Reverse effect of home-use binaural beats brain stimulation. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):11079. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-38313-4 PMID 37422545 Go to source

  5. Leistiko ve ark. 2024 · Experiment · 58 participants

    In 58 healthy adults, 40 Hz (gamma) binaural beats did not change attention-test performance (reaction time, errors, attention networks) compared with a control tone, and had no effect on a single-item self-rating of anxiety.

    No significant difference from a control tone in attention measures or self-rated anxiety

    First published online in 2023. Within-subject crossover with randomized order.

    Leistiko NM, Madanat L, Yeung WKA, Stone JM. Effects of gamma frequency binaural beats on attention and anxiety. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(6):5032-5039. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04681-3 PMID 37359672 Go to source

  6. Robison ve ark. 2022 · Experiment

    Three experiments tested 16 Hz (beta) binaural beats on sustained attention. The first two gave inconsistent results; their combined data gave rather strong evidence against the hypothesis that beta beats improve sustained attention. Pupil measures showed no effect either.

    First published online in 2021.

    Robison MK, Obulasetty M, Blais C, Wingert KM, Brewer GA. The effect of binaural beat stimulation on sustained attention. Psychol Res. 2022;86(3):808-822. doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01524-3 PMID 33978805 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence

Claim reviewed: Binaural beats entrain brain waves to the beat frequency (brainwave entrainment).

What do we know?

The brainstem responds at the two tone frequencies, while a measurable EEG response at the beat frequency can occur in the cortex; for binaural beats it is weaker than for monaural beats and weakens further under white-noise masking.

What don't we know?

In a review of 14 EEG studies, only 5 were consistent with the entrainment hypothesis and 8 contradicted it. It has not been shown that this response reliably changes mental state; in one study mood did not change at all.

Wording we use in the app: The brain may show a weak response at the beat frequency; this response has not been shown to reliably change mental state.

Sources (3)
  1. Ingendoh ve ark. 2023 · Systematic review · 14 studies

    Of 14 EEG studies on binaural beats and brain oscillations, 5 were consistent with the entrainment hypothesis, 8 contradicted it and 1 was mixed. The studies differed greatly in method, which limits comparison; the authors call for standardized approaches.

    No pooled effect; of 14 EEG studies, 5 were consistent with entrainment, 8 contradicted it and 1 was mixed

    Ingendoh RM, Posny ES, Heine A. Binaural beats to entrain the brain? A systematic review of the effects of binaural beat stimulation on brain oscillatory activity, and the implications for psychological research and intervention. PLoS One. 2023;18(5):e0286023. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286023 PMID 37205669 Go to source

  2. Orozco Perez ve ark. 2020 · Experiment · 16 participants

    In a 16-person EEG experiment, both binaural and monaural beats produced a brainstem response at the tone frequencies and a cortical response at the beat frequency; the cortical response to binaural beats was weaker than to monaural beats. Neither stimulus changed mood.

    Orozco Perez HD, Dumas G, Lehmann A. Binaural Beats through the Auditory Pathway: From Brainstem to Connectivity Patterns. eNeuro. 2020;7(2):ENEURO.0232-19.2020. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0232-19.2020 PMID 32066611 Go to source

  3. Melnichuk ve ark. 2025 · Experiment · 80 participants

    Sixteen parameter conditions were tested; 80 undergraduates were randomized and 64 analysed. 40 Hz binaural beats with a low (340 Hz) carrier improved general attention performance but did not prevent the decline of attention over time. EEG showed a response at the beat frequency that varied with parameters and weakened under white-noise masking. The authors say the finding needs replication.

    Higher hit rate than a pure tone for 40 Hz beats with a 340 Hz carrier (p = 0.002); no effect on the vigilance decrement

    Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW. A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):4308. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z PMID 39910150 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence

Claim reviewed: Binaural beats may support falling asleep and sleep quality.

What do we know?

Two small pilot studies reported positive results: in an uncontrolled study, the sleep diaries of 20 students improved; in a 10-person lab study, binaural beats with a varying beat difference shortened the time to fall asleep.

What don't we know?

Comparison conditions are weak (no control or a silent night) and samples are very small. A systematic review of music and binaural beats in young adults could not run a meta-analysis because studies were heterogeneous; small samples further limit certainty. In a home study of 221 people, binaural, monaural and beat-free monotonous sounds made no difference to sleep latency.

Wording we use in the app: Research on sleep is at an early stage; there are small pilot studies.

Sources (4)
  1. Dabiri ve ark. 2022 · Pilot study · 20 participants

    Twenty healthy students had a baseline week without sound, then a week of nightly 90-minute 3 Hz binaural beats (174/177 Hz). Sleep diaries showed shorter sleep latency, fewer awakenings and longer sleep. There was no control or sham group, and sleep was measured only by diary.

    Dabiri R, Monazzam Esmaielpour MR, Salmani Nodoushan M, Khaneshenas F, Zakerian SA. The effect of auditory stimulation using delta binaural beat for a better sleep and post-sleep mood: A pilot study. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221102243. doi:10.1177/20552076221102243 PMID 35615269 Go to source

  2. Lee ve ark. 2024 · Pilot study · 10 participants

    A two-night crossover proof-of-concept study with polysomnography in 10 healthy participants: 'dynamic' binaural beats with a 0-3 Hz varying difference shortened sleep latency compared with a silent control night.

    The control night was silent; no matched sound was used.

    Lee HA, Lee WJ, Kim SU, Kim H, Ahn M, Kim J, et al. Effect of dynamic binaural beats on sleep quality: a proof-of-concept study with questionnaire and biosignals. Sleep. 2024;47(10):zsae097. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae097 PMID 38629490 Go to source

  3. Elnazer 2026 · Systematic review

    In a systematic review of music and binaural-beat interventions in young adults, most studies reported a positive change in at least one of anxiety, sleep or cognition. Heterogeneity ruled out a meta-analysis, and the author notes that small samples limit certainty.

    No pooled estimate; study-level SMDs 0.3-0.6

    The abstract reports 10 trials, the body 12 studies (about 970 participants).

    Elnazer HY. Music and binaural beat interventions for young adults: A systematic review of effects on anxiety, sleep, and cognition. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2026;38:e15. doi:10.1017/neu.2026.10057 PMID 41656644 Go to source

  4. Shumov ve ark. 2023 · Experiment · 221 participants

    221 people fell asleep at home with an app on their own phone while listening to three kinds of monotonous sound at the same pitch: binaural beats, monaural beats and a sound without beats. Sleep latency did not differ significantly between the three conditions (p = 0.21).

    The article is in Russian; this summary is based on the English abstract.

    Shumov DE, Sveshnikov DS, Bakaeva ZV, Dorokhov VB. Monotonous sound stimuli embedded with either binaural or monaural beats have the same effect on sleep latency: study on a large subject group. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2023;123(4):109-113. doi:10.17116/jnevro2023123041109 PMID 37084374 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence

Claim reviewed: Listening to binaural beats before a task works better than listening only during it.

What do we know?

In a meta-analysis's moderator analysis, listening before the task (or before and during it) gave better results than listening only during it, and longer listening increased the effect.

What don't we know?

This rests on a moderator comparison within one meta-analysis; few experiments test the question directly, and in a small experiment that directly varied onset time, results were mixed. The overall effect itself is debated (see the focus claim).

Wording we use in the app: In one meta-analysis, listening before the task gave better results.

Sources (2)
  1. Garcia-Argibay ve ark. 2019 · Meta-analysis · 22 studies

    A meta-analysis of 22 studies on memory, attention, anxiety and pain found a medium, significant overall effect. Listening before the task (or before and during it) worked better than listening only during it, and longer exposure increased the effect. Masking with white or pink noise did not appear necessary.

    Overall g = 0.45 (35 effect sizes from 22 studies)

    First published online in 2018. The abstract gives no confidence interval. Its reference list includes a study retracted in 2021 (Colzato et al. 2017, PMID 28409319); the abstract does not show whether it was included in the analysis.

    Garcia-Argibay M, Santed MA, Reales JM. Efficacy of binaural auditory beats in cognition, anxiety, and pain perception: a meta-analysis. Psychol Res. 2019;83(2):357-372. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1066-8 PMID 30073406 Go to source

  2. Melnichuk ve ark. 2025 · Experiment · 80 participants

    Sixteen parameter conditions were tested; 80 undergraduates were randomized and 64 analysed. 40 Hz binaural beats with a low (340 Hz) carrier improved general attention performance but did not prevent the decline of attention over time. EEG showed a response at the beat frequency that varied with parameters and weakened under white-noise masking. The authors say the finding needs replication.

    Higher hit rate than a pure tone for 40 Hz beats with a 340 Hz carrier (p = 0.002); no effect on the vigilance decrement

    Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW. A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):4308. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z PMID 39910150 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence

Claim reviewed: Sleeping with white, pink or brown noise improves sleep quality.

What do we know?

A meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials of white noise found better sleep-quality scores in adults and older adults; much of the evidence comes from intensive-care patients and infants. In a review of 34 studies, 19 reported positive results (only 6 of 18 for white noise). A 2025 systematic review of 7 randomised trials in hospitalised adults found white noise improved sleep efficiency and was well tolerated; the studies were small and varied, so no meta-analysis was possible.

What don't we know?

A systematic review of 38 studies rated the evidence 'very low' quality and warned that continuous noise may harm sleep and hearing. In a 25-person lab study, pink noise (50 dBA) reduced REM sleep by 18.6 minutes in one night. Some infant sleep machines were measured reaching hazardous levels at maximum volume.

Wording we use in the app: Evidence on sleep is low quality and mixed; in one study pink noise reduced REM sleep. Keep the volume low.

Sources (6)
  1. Riedy ve ark. 2021 · Systematic review · 38 studies

    Across 38 studies of continuous white or similar broadband noise and sleep, findings ranged from noise helping sleep to disrupting it. By GRADE, the quality of evidence that continuous noise benefits sleep was very low; the authors warn that continuous noise may also harm sleep and hearing.

    Riedy SM, Smith MG, Rocha S, Basner M. Noise as a sleep aid: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2021;55:101385. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101385 PMID 33007706 Go to source

  2. Capezuti ve ark. 2022 · Systematic review · 34 studies · 1,103 participants

    The review covered 34 studies (1,103 adults) of white noise, pink noise and mixed-audio interventions; 19 reported improved sleep outcomes, with a higher share for pink noise. The authors concluded there was no strong evidence supporting auditory stimulation; no adverse effects were reported with short-term use.

    No pooled effect; 19 of 34 studies reported improved sleep outcomes

    Binaural tones were excluded from the review.

    Capezuti E, Pain K, Alamag E, Chen X, Philibert V, Krieger AC. Systematic review: auditory stimulation and sleep. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(6):1697-1709. doi:10.5664/jcsm.9860 PMID 34964434 Go to source

  3. Ding ve ark. 2025 · Meta-analysis · 12 studies · 1,301 participants

    A meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials of white noise (1,301 participants: infants, adults and older adults, including intensive-care patients) found better sleep-quality scores (PSQI) in adults and older adults and longer 24-hour sleep in infants. The authors note the results are limited by heterogeneity and study quality.

    Adults: PSQI mean difference −3.70 (95% CI −4.90 to −2.50); infants: 24-h total sleep time +137.5 min (95% CI 67.8 to 207.2)

    Much of the evidence comes from intensive-care patients and infants.

    Ding Y, Sun X, Yin J, Wang Z, Zhang X, Zhang D, et al. Impact of white noise on sleep quality across age groups and in critically ill/non-critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med. 2025;136:106869. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106869 PMID 41151421 Go to source

  4. Basner ve ark. 2026 · Randomised controlled trial · 25 participants

    A seven-night laboratory study in 25 healthy adults: intermittent environmental noise mainly reduced deep sleep (N3), whereas pink noise mainly reduced REM sleep, and adding pink noise to environmental noise worsened sleep structure further. Earplugs prevented most environmental-noise effects. The authors caution against widespread, indiscriminate use of broadband noise.

    Pink noise alone (50 dBA) vs a quiet night: REM sleep −18.6 min (p = .0003)

    Basner M, Smith MG, Cordoza M, Kayser MS, Carlin M, Ecker AJ, et al. Efficacy of pink noise and earplugs for mitigating the effects of intermittent environmental noise exposure on sleep. Sleep. 2026;49(5):zsag001. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsag001 PMID 41627391 Go to source

  5. Hugh ve ark. 2014 · Experiment

    Fourteen infant sleep machines were measured at maximum volume: at 30 cm all exceeded the 50 dBA limit recommended for hospital nurseries, and 3 exceeded 85 dBA. The authors concluded these devices can produce levels that may damage infant hearing.

    Hugh SC, Wolter NE, Propst EJ, Gordon KA, Cushing SL, Papsin BC. Infant sleep machines and hazardous sound pressure levels. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):677-681. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3617 PMID 24590753 Go to source

  6. Khandelwal ve ark. 2025 · Systematic review · 7 studies · 496 participants

    Seven randomised trials (496 participants) of sound machines for hospitalised adults were reviewed; six used white noise. The studies showed improved sleep efficiency with white noise, which was well tolerated. Differences in duration, participants and scales prevented a meta-analysis.

    Khandelwal K, Anyim A, Shu S, Gerberi D, Yousufuddin M, Pagali S. Impact and efficacy of sound machine on sleep in hospitalized adults: A systematic review. Sleep Med X. 2025;10:100154. doi:10.1016/j.sleepx.2025.100154 PMID 41141950 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidence

Claim reviewed: Music tuned to 432 Hz is more calming than music tuned to 440 Hz.

What do we know?

Small studies reported a borderline drop in heart rate with 432 Hz (33 people) and, in cancer patients with a live monochord, slightly larger drops in heart rate and pulse-wave velocity than with 443 Hz (43 people). In a trial with 162 students in Türkiye, 432 Hz music raised one salivary biomarker (GRP78), which is not a measure of calm.

What don't we know?

Results are inconsistent: in emergency staff, anxiety also fell without music and groups were not compared with each other; in kickboxers, 440 Hz music was linked to better performance than 432 Hz; in students, attention-test scores did not differ between groups. Studies are small and mostly pilots.

Wording we use in the app: There are small, inconsistent preliminary findings; we offer 432 Hz as a tuning preference.

Sources (5)
  1. Calamassi ve Pomponi 2019 · Pilot study · 33 participants

    In 33 healthy volunteers, music tuned to 432 Hz was associated with a borderline-significant (p = 0.05) larger drop in heart rate than 440 Hz; trends in blood pressure and breathing rate were not significant. The authors call for larger randomized studies.

    432 Hz vs 440 Hz: mean heart rate −4.79 bpm (p = 0.05, borderline)

    Erratum published: Explore (NY) 2020;16(1):8, PMID 32113613.

    Calamassi D, Pomponi GP. Music Tuned to 440 Hz Versus 432 Hz and the Health Effects: A Double-blind Cross-over Pilot Study. Explore (NY). 2019;15(4):283-290. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2019.04.001 PMID 31031095 Go to source

  2. Calamassi ve ark. 2022 · Pilot study · 54 participants

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, 54 emergency staff compared 440 Hz music, 432 Hz music and a break without music. State anxiety fell in all three groups, even without music; drops in breathing rate and systolic blood pressure appeared only in the 432 Hz group. Groups were compared only before and after within themselves, not with each other.

    Calamassi D, Li Vigni ML, Fumagalli C, Gheri F, Pomponi GP, Bambi S. The Listening to music tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz to reduce anxiety and stress in emergency nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a double-blind, randomized controlled pilot study. Acta Biomed. 2022;93(S2):e2022149. doi:10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12915 PMID 35545982 Go to source

  3. Hohneck ve ark. 2025 · Randomised controlled trial · 43 participants

    In 43 cancer patients, a 15-minute live monochord session tuned to 432 Hz was compared with 443 Hz. Both lowered heart rate and brought similar positive changes in emotional well-being, fatigue, anxiety and stress scores; the drops in heart rate and pulse-wave velocity were larger with 432 Hz, while other measures did not differ.

    Heart-rate change −3 (432 Hz) vs −1 bpm (443 Hz), p = 0.04

    Hohneck A, Rodríguez ÁM, Weingärtner S, Merx K, Sarodnick F, von Gagern F, et al. Differential effects of sound interventions tuned to 432 Hz or 443 Hz on cardiovascular parameters in cancer patients: a randomized cross-over trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025;25(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12906-025-04758-5 PMID 39844155 Go to source

  4. Jebabli ve ark. 2025 · Randomised controlled trial · 28 participants

    In 28 kickboxers, warming up with music at about 440 Hz was associated with better speed-test performance and lower perceived exertion than music at 432 Hz; both beat no music.

    Jebabli N, Boujabli M, Khlifi M, Ouerghi N, Bouassida A, Ben Abderrahman A, et al. Effects of 440-Hz vs. 432-Hz preferred music frequencies, during warm-up, on intermittent anaerobic speed test performance in men and women kickboxers: a double-blind crossover study. PeerJ. 2025;13:e19084. doi:10.7717/peerj.19084 PMID 40061232 Go to source

  5. Bozok ve ark. 2026 · Randomised controlled trial · 162 participants

    162 healthy university students under exam stress were randomized to no music, 528 Hz music or 432 Hz music. 528 Hz music raised salivary BDNF and CREB, and 432 Hz music raised GRP78; Stroop attention-test performance did not differ between groups.

    528 Hz versus control: higher salivary BDNF and CREB (p < 0.05); GRP78 elevated in the 432 Hz group (p < 0.05); no between-group Stroop difference

    The reported registration number is not in ClinicalTrials.gov format; the registration could not be confirmed.

    Bozok ÜG, Özcan GB, Bayraktar B, Özen D. Acute Music-Frequency Exposure Modulates Salivary Stress and Neurotrophic Markers in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Brain Behav. 2026;16(5):e71452. doi:10.1002/brb3.71452 PMID 42043979 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: Listening to natural sounds may help reduce signs of stress.

What do we know?

In a meta-analysis within a review of 36 publications, natural sounds were linked to lower stress and annoyance. A meta-analysis of 15 studies of live or recorded natural sounds found lower anxiety scores, heart rate and blood pressure; another meta-analysis against a quiet environment favoured natural sounds on some physiological measures.

What don't we know?

The studies used real or recorded natural sounds; whether synthesised rain, stream or wind textures have the same effect has not been tested. That is why the app's nature-textured sessions are not linked to this claim. Heterogeneity is high, and perceived stress did not change against a quiet environment.

Wording we use in the app: The effect of natural sounds on relaxation is being researched; the app's textures are synthesised and are not linked to this evidence.

Sources (3)
  1. Buxton ve ark. 2021 · Meta-analysis · 36 studies

    A systematic review of 36 publications on the health effects of natural sounds; a meta-analysis of 18 of them found reduced stress and annoyance and improved health and positive affect.

    Stress and annoyance: g = −0.60 (95% CI −0.97 to −0.23)

    Buxton RT, Pearson AL, Allou C, Fristrup K, Wittemyer G. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(14):e2013097118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2013097118 PMID 33753555 Go to source

  2. Zhu ve ark. 2024 · Meta-analysis · 15 studies · 1,285 participants

    A meta-analysis of 15 studies (1285 participants) of listening to live or recorded natural sounds: reductions in anxiety measures, heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate; no consistent result for cognitive recovery. Heterogeneity between studies was marked.

    Zhu R, Yuan L, Pan Y, Wang Y, Xiu D, Liu W. Effects of natural sound exposure on health recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2024;921:171052. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171052 PMID 38373459 Go to source

  3. Fan ve Baharum 2024 · Meta-analysis

    A meta-analysis comparing natural sounds with a quiet environment: differences favouring natural sounds in heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate; no difference in perceived stress, mean arterial pressure or oxygen saturation. The authors note the evidence is somewhat inconsistent.

    Fan L, Baharum MR. The effect of exposure to natural sounds on stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stress. 2024;27(1):2402519. doi:10.1080/10253890.2024.2402519 PMID 39285764 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: Yoga nidra (guided deep rest) may help reduce stress and anxiety.

What do we know?

A meta-analysis of 73 studies (5201 participants) found moderate-to-large effects on stress and anxiety.

What don't we know?

Methodological quality is low and delivery varies widely; the authors think the effects are likely inflated. Yoga nidra includes spoken guidance; it is not the same as sound alone, and the app has no narrated sessions yet.

Wording we use in the app: Research on guided deep rest is promising, but methodological quality is low.

Sources (1)
  1. Ghai ve ark. 2026 · Meta-analysis · 73 studies · 5,201 participants

    A meta-analysis of 73 studies (5201 participants) of yoga nidra found moderate-to-large effects on stress and anxiety. The authors note low methodological quality and varied delivery, and say the effects are likely inflated.

    Stress: g = −0.80 (active comparator), −1.70 (no comparator)

    First published online in 2025.

    Ghai S, Odyniec P, Ghai I. Effects of Yoga Nidra on Stress, Anxiety, and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2026;1556(1):e70149. doi:10.1111/nyas.70149 PMID 41327816 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

▲ C · Preliminary/mixed evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: White or pink noise may slightly improve laboratory attention-task performance in young people with attention difficulties.

What do we know?

In a meta-analysis of 13 studies, white and pink noise gave a small benefit (g = 0.249) in children and young adults with ADHD or high attention-problem symptoms.

What don't we know?

In people without marked attention difficulties noise slightly worsened performance (g = −0.212), so it cannot be said to improve focus for users in general. Brown noise was never tested. Effects were measured on lab tasks, and appropriate levels are unknown.

Wording we use in the app: The effect of noise on attention varies from person to person: small benefits in some, small harms in others.

Sources (1)
  1. Nigg ve ark. 2024 · Meta-analysis · 13 studies

    In children and young adults with ADHD or high attention-problem symptoms (13 studies, 335 people), white and pink noise gave a small benefit on laboratory attention tasks. In comparison groups without these symptoms (11 studies) the effect was small and negative. No studies of brown noise were found.

    With attention problems g = 0.249; without g = −0.212

    First published online in February 2024. Appropriate sound levels are unknown.

    Nigg JT, Bruton A, Kozlowski MB, Johnstone JM, Karalunas SL. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Do White Noise or Pink Noise Help With Task Performance in Youth With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder or With Elevated Attention Problems?. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024;63(8):778-788. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2023.12.014 PMID 38428577 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidence

■ D · Insufficient evidenceUnder research

Claim reviewed: 40 Hz sound (and light) stimulation protects cognition and slows the progression of Alzheimer's disease.

What do we know?

40 Hz stimulation is studied in Alzheimer's research because of animal findings; human studies have used light, sound or both. A meta-analysis of 11 controlled studies found no significant change in cognitive function, and tinnitus was reported more often with stimulation. A review of 62 sound-only studies found that brain findings from animal models were not consistently replicated in humans; some studies reported positive changes in cognitive measures.

What don't we know?

The large sham-controlled HOPE study (673 participants) completed on 17 August 2026 (primary completion 22 June 2026); as of 3 October 2026 no results are posted or published. The effect of 40 Hz binaural beats heard through headphones on attention is also inconsistent: one study found none, a small one found better general attention. In the earlier OVERTURE trial (76 people, 6 months), the light-and-sound device did not separate from sham on the primary clinical measure; most authors work for the company that makes it.

Wording we use in the app: 40 Hz is a gamma rhythm studied with light-and-sound devices. This session is not a treatment.

Sources (7)
  1. Ang ve ark. 2025 · Meta-analysis · 11 studies · 341 participants

    A meta-analysis of 11 controlled studies in 341 people over 50 with Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment: 40 Hz light-and-sound stimulation did not significantly change cognitive function or daily activities, though some brain-structure measures changed. Tinnitus was reported more often with stimulation (2 studies).

    Cognitive function SMD 0.16 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.68; not significant); tinnitus risk difference 0.16 (p = 0.01; 2 studies)

    Ang S, Zhang X, Hong J, Xue K, Li J, Du X, et al. The safety and efficacy of gamma frequency auditory and visual stimulation in the treatment of alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2025;15(1):523. doi:10.1038/s41398-025-03788-4 PMID 41381439 Go to source

  2. Bolland ve ark. 2026 · Systematic review · 62 studies · 2,179 participants

    The review covered 62 studies (2,179 participants) of sound-only gamma stimulation in healthy and cognitively declining groups. Some reported positive changes in cognition and brain measures, but animal findings were not consistently replicated in humans, EEG responses did not predict cognitive effects and methods varied widely.

    No pooled effect (qualitative synthesis)

    First published online in 2025.

    Bolland E, De Burca A, Wang SH, Khalil A, McLoughlin G. Efficacy of auditory gamma stimulation for cognitive decline: a systematic review of individual and group differences across cognitively impaired and healthy populations. NPJ Aging. 2026;12(1):8. doi:10.1038/s41514-025-00305-1 PMID 41350292 Go to source

  3. Chan ve ark. 2025 · Pilot study · 5 participants

    Five people with mild Alzheimer's disease received 1 hour of daily 40 Hz light-and-sound stimulation for two years, with no adverse events. In 3 late-onset patients, decline on cognitive measures was slower than in comparison groups drawn from external registries. The authors describe it as a small pilot supporting further research.

    Chan D, de Weck G, Jackson BL, Suk HJ, Milman NP, Kitchener E, et al. Gamma sensory stimulation in mild Alzheimer's dementia: An open-label extension study. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(10):e70792. doi:10.1002/alz.70792 PMID 41137616 Go to source

  4. Cognito Therapeutics 2022 · Clinical trial registration · 673 participants

    A randomized, quadruple-blind study comparing 12 months of daily 60-minute gamma sensory stimulation (visual and audio per the registration; the 40 Hz detail is a company statement) with a sham device in Alzheimer's disease. With 673 participants, primary completion was 22 June 2026 and completion 17 August 2026; no results are posted in the registry (last update 9 September 2026) and none had been published as of 3 October 2026.

    Cognito Therapeutics. A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Pivotal Study of Sensory Stimulation in Subjects With Alzheimer's Disease (HOPE Study). ClinicalTrials.gov; 2022. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05637801 Go to source

  5. Leistiko ve ark. 2024 · Experiment · 58 participants

    In 58 healthy adults, 40 Hz (gamma) binaural beats did not change attention-test performance (reaction time, errors, attention networks) compared with a control tone, and had no effect on a single-item self-rating of anxiety.

    No significant difference from a control tone in attention measures or self-rated anxiety

    First published online in 2023. Within-subject crossover with randomized order.

    Leistiko NM, Madanat L, Yeung WKA, Stone JM. Effects of gamma frequency binaural beats on attention and anxiety. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(6):5032-5039. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04681-3 PMID 37359672 Go to source

  6. Melnichuk ve ark. 2025 · Experiment · 80 participants

    Sixteen parameter conditions were tested; 80 undergraduates were randomized and 64 analysed. 40 Hz binaural beats with a low (340 Hz) carrier improved general attention performance but did not prevent the decline of attention over time. EEG showed a response at the beat frequency that varied with parameters and weakened under white-noise masking. The authors say the finding needs replication.

    Higher hit rate than a pure tone for 40 Hz beats with a 340 Hz carrier (p = 0.002); no effect on the vigilance decrement

    Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW. A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):4308. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z PMID 39910150 Go to source

  7. Hajós ve ark. 2024 · Randomised controlled trial · 76 participants

    OVERTURE: a 6-month randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in 76 people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease using a device that delivers light and sound together for 1 hour a day. It was safe and well tolerated. There was no statistical separation between active and sham groups on the primary clinical measure or two secondary cognitive measures; some secondary measures reached nominal significance.

    Most authors are employees of, and hold stock options in, the company that makes the device. The trial was not powered to assess efficacy.

    Hajós M, Boasso A, Hempel E, Shpokayte M, Konisky A, Seshagiri CV, Fomenko V, Kwan K, Nicodemus-Johnson J, Hendrix S, Vaughan B, Kern R, Megerian JT, Malchano Z. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy estimate of evoked gamma oscillation in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1343588. doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1343588 PMID 38515445 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidence

Claim reviewed: A 528 Hz tone or music reduces stress.

What do we know?

In a small 9-person study, salivary cortisol fell and tension scores decreased after 528 Hz music; randomization and blinding were not reported. In a randomized trial with 162 students in Türkiye, 528 Hz music raised salivary BDNF and CREB.

What don't we know?

What these biomarker changes mean for everyday stress is unclear; attention-test performance did not differ between groups in the same trial. The findings have not been independently replicated.

Wording we use in the app: There is one small study and one biomarker trial; it has not been reliably shown that 528 Hz reduces stress.

Sources (2)
  1. Akimoto ve ark. 2018 · Pilot study · 9 participants

    Nine healthy adults listened to 528 Hz and 440 Hz music on different days. After 528 Hz music, salivary cortisol fell, oxytocin rose and tension-anxiety scores decreased; there were no significant salivary changes after 440 Hz.

    Not indexed in PubMed; randomization and blinding are not reported.

    Akimoto K, Hu A, Yamaguchi T, Kobayashi H. Effect of 528 Hz Music on the Endocrine System and Autonomic Nervous System. Health (Irvine Calif). 2018;10(9):1159-1170. doi:10.4236/health.2018.109088 Go to source

  2. Bozok ve ark. 2026 · Randomised controlled trial · 162 participants

    162 healthy university students under exam stress were randomized to no music, 528 Hz music or 432 Hz music. 528 Hz music raised salivary BDNF and CREB, and 432 Hz music raised GRP78; Stroop attention-test performance did not differ between groups.

    528 Hz versus control: higher salivary BDNF and CREB (p < 0.05); GRP78 elevated in the 432 Hz group (p < 0.05); no between-group Stroop difference

    The reported registration number is not in ClinicalTrials.gov format; the registration could not be confirmed.

    Bozok ÜG, Özcan GB, Bayraktar B, Özen D. Acute Music-Frequency Exposure Modulates Salivary Stress and Neurotrophic Markers in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Brain Behav. 2026;16(5):e71452. doi:10.1002/brb3.71452 PMID 42043979 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidence

Claim reviewed: Binaural beats increase lucid dreaming.

What do we know?

Higher gamma activity around 40 Hz than in REM sleep was measured frontally during lucid dreams (6 people). In one study, applying 25 and 40 Hz electrical current there increased self-awareness in dreams; but the stimulation was electrical, not sound, and in a follow-up study, signal-verified lucid dreams also occurred with sham stimulation.

What don't we know?

No controlled study has tested whether binaural beats increase lucid dreaming. A review of 35 studies found that no technique reliably induces lucid dreams.

Wording we use in the app: There is no controlled evidence that binaural beats increase lucid dreaming; they can be used as part of a relaxing preparation.

Sources (4)
  1. Voss ve ark. 2009 · Experiment · 6 participants

    Sleep-lab EEG recordings of 6 volunteers trained in lucid dreaming showed higher gamma activity around 40 Hz, especially frontally, during lucid dreams. The authors present this as preliminary evidence that lucid dreaming is a hybrid state between waking and REM sleep.

    Voss U, Holzmann R, Tuin I, Hobson JA. Lucid dreaming: a state of consciousness with features of both waking and non-lucid dreaming. Sleep. 2009;32(9):1191-1200. doi:10.1093/sleep/32.9.1191 PMID 19750924 Go to source

  2. Voss ve ark. 2014 · Experiment

    Weak electrical current (tACS) in the low gamma band (25 and 40 Hz) applied frontally during REM sleep increased self-awareness in dreams; other frequencies had no effect. The stimulation was electrical, not sound.

    Voss U, Holzmann R, Hobson A, Paulus W, Koppehele-Gossel J, Klimke A, et al. Induction of self awareness in dreams through frontal low current stimulation of gamma activity. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(6):810-812. doi:10.1038/nn.3719 PMID 24816141 Go to source

  3. Blanchette-Carrière ve ark. 2020 · Experiment

    In an attempt to induce lucid dreams with electrical stimulation (tACS), signal-verified lucid dreams occurred with stimulation but also with the sham procedure. The authors suggest situational factors may be decisive.

    Blanchette-Carrière C, Julien SH, Picard-Deland C, Bouchard M, Carrier J, Paquette T, et al. Attempted induction of signalled lucid dreaming by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Conscious Cogn. 2020;83:102957. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2020.102957 PMID 32534325 Go to source

  4. Stumbrys ve ark. 2012 · Systematic review · 35 studies

    The 35 studies of lucid-dream induction techniques (cognitive techniques, external stimulation, a drug) were of relatively low methodological quality; no technique was verified to induce lucid dreams reliably and consistently, though some looked promising.

    Stumbrys T, Erlacher D, Schädlich M, Schredl M. Induction of lucid dreams: a systematic review of evidence. Conscious Cogn. 2012;21(3):1456-1475. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.003 PMID 22841958 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidence

Claim reviewed: Monaural beats and isochronic tones relax listeners or help them focus.

What do we know?

Monaural beats produce a measurable EEG response at the beat rate; in a 16-person study it was stronger than for binaural beats, while mood did not change. The linked sources have no EEG data for isochronic tones. In people prone to mind wandering, monaural theta beats reduced mind wandering compared with a sine tone; a reduction compared with silence appeared only in a subgroup.

What don't we know?

Very few controlled studies test effects on relaxation or focus directly. In a surgical trial with 90 patients in Türkiye, isochronic tones did not reduce anxiety compared with no sound.

Wording we use in the app: Evidence for effects on relaxation or focus is insufficient; we offer it as a listening experience.

Sources (3)
  1. Orozco Perez ve ark. 2020 · Experiment · 16 participants

    In a 16-person EEG experiment, both binaural and monaural beats produced a brainstem response at the tone frequencies and a cortical response at the beat frequency; the cortical response to binaural beats was weaker than to monaural beats. Neither stimulus changed mood.

    Orozco Perez HD, Dumas G, Lehmann A. Binaural Beats through the Auditory Pathway: From Brainstem to Connectivity Patterns. eNeuro. 2020;7(2):ENEURO.0232-19.2020. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0232-19.2020 PMID 32066611 Go to source

  2. Akkurt ve Ekici 2026 · Randomised controlled trial · 90 participants

    In 90 patients undergoing impacted lower third molar surgery in Türkiye, neither binaural beats nor isochronic tones reduced anxiety compared with no sound; only isolated physiological differences appeared. Of the patients who received sound, 78.3% said they would prefer it again in future procedures.

    No significant between-group differences in pre- or postoperative anxiety scores

    In press; no volume or pages yet.

    Akkurt O, Ekici Ö. Effect of binaural beats and isochronic tones on anxiety during impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2026.07.006 PMID 42471303 Go to source

  3. Chaieb ve ark. 2022 · Experiment

    In participants with a high tendency to mind-wander, mind wandering fell significantly during monaural theta beats compared with a sine tone; a reduction compared with silence appeared only in a subgroup selected with stricter criteria. The authors report that the main hypothesis was only partly confirmed.

    Chaieb L, Krakau S, Reber TP, Fell J. Modulation of Mind Wandering Using Monaural Beat Stimulation in Subjects With High Trait-Level Mind Wandering. Front Psychol. 2022;13:815442. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815442 PMID 35769725 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: Isochronic tones or monaural beats are more effective than binaural beats.

What do we know?

In a 16-person EEG study, monaural beats produced a stronger cortical response than binaural beats, but mood did not change with either. In a surgical trial with 90 patients, there was no anxiety difference between binaural and isochronic groups. In a 221-person home study, monaural and binaural beats did not differ from each other or from a beat-free sound in sleep latency.

What don't we know?

There are not enough studies directly comparing the methods on meaningful outcomes, and a stronger EEG response has not been shown to mean a better outcome.

Wording we use in the app: No method has been shown to be superior.

Sources (3)
  1. Orozco Perez ve ark. 2020 · Experiment · 16 participants

    In a 16-person EEG experiment, both binaural and monaural beats produced a brainstem response at the tone frequencies and a cortical response at the beat frequency; the cortical response to binaural beats was weaker than to monaural beats. Neither stimulus changed mood.

    Orozco Perez HD, Dumas G, Lehmann A. Binaural Beats through the Auditory Pathway: From Brainstem to Connectivity Patterns. eNeuro. 2020;7(2):ENEURO.0232-19.2020. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0232-19.2020 PMID 32066611 Go to source

  2. Akkurt ve Ekici 2026 · Randomised controlled trial · 90 participants

    In 90 patients undergoing impacted lower third molar surgery in Türkiye, neither binaural beats nor isochronic tones reduced anxiety compared with no sound; only isolated physiological differences appeared. Of the patients who received sound, 78.3% said they would prefer it again in future procedures.

    No significant between-group differences in pre- or postoperative anxiety scores

    In press; no volume or pages yet.

    Akkurt O, Ekici Ö. Effect of binaural beats and isochronic tones on anxiety during impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2026.07.006 PMID 42471303 Go to source

  3. Shumov ve ark. 2023 · Experiment · 221 participants

    221 people fell asleep at home with an app on their own phone while listening to three kinds of monotonous sound at the same pitch: binaural beats, monaural beats and a sound without beats. Sleep latency did not differ significantly between the three conditions (p = 0.21).

    The article is in Russian; this summary is based on the English abstract.

    Shumov DE, Sveshnikov DS, Bakaeva ZV, Dorokhov VB. Monotonous sound stimuli embedded with either binaural or monaural beats have the same effect on sleep latency: study on a large subject group. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2023;123(4):109-113. doi:10.17116/jnevro2023123041109 PMID 37084374 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: Listening to singing bowls helps relaxation.

What do we know?

A systematic review found only 4 peer-reviewed studies on singing bowls; improvements in mood and some physiological measures were reported.

What don't we know?

There are very few studies and the designs are weak; the authors do not yet recommend singing bowl practices. The studies used real bowls; bowl-like tones generated on the device are not linked to this evidence.

Wording we use in the app: Singing bowls are a traditional listening practice; evidence on their effects is very limited.

Sources (1)
  1. Stanhope ve Weinstein 2020 · Systematic review · 4 studies

    A systematic review of the health effects of singing bowls found only 4 peer-reviewed studies, two with low-level designs. Improvements in mood and some physiological measures were reported; the authors do not yet recommend singing bowl practices because of the few studies and risk of bias.

    Stanhope J, Weinstein P. The human health effects of singing bowls: A systematic review. Complement Ther Med. 2020;51:102412. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102412 PMID 32507429 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidence

Claim reviewed: Listening to rhythmic drumming may facilitate absorption and relaxation.

What do we know?

A narrative review reports that findings on rhythmic sound fit the view that it facilitates absorption and relaxation. In an fMRI study of 15 experienced practitioners, trance with drumming came with changes in brain networks linked to internally oriented thought.

What don't we know?

Controlled studies are few, and the fMRI participants were experienced practitioners. It has not been shown that drumming brings brain waves to a particular frequency; the proposed mechanism is a hypothesis.

Wording we use in the app: You can sink into listening with a rhythmic drum; evidence on its effects is limited.

Sources (2)
  1. Aparicio-Terrés ve ark. 2025 · Review

    A narrative review of behavioural, cognitive and neural findings on non-ordinary states induced by drumming and rhythmic sounds. The findings fit the view that these sounds facilitate absorption and relaxation; neural findings vary with method. The mechanism the authors propose is a hypothesis.

    Aparicio-Terrés R, López-Mochales S, Díaz-Andreu M, Escera C. The neurobiology of altered states of consciousness induced by drumming and other rhythmic sound patterns. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025;1550(1):55-70. doi:10.1111/nyas.15403 PMID 40668575 Go to source

  2. Hove ve ark. 2016 · Experiment · 15 participants

    Fifteen experienced shamanic practitioners listened to rhythmic drumming in an fMRI scanner and either entered trance or did not. During trance, a network linked to internally oriented thought was more co-active with control networks, and auditory pathways were less connected.

    First published online in 2015. Participants were experienced practitioners; results do not generalise to all listeners.

    Hove MJ, Stelzer J, Nierhaus T, Thiel SD, Gundlach C, Margulies DS, Van Dijk KR, Turner R, Keller PE, Merker B. Brain Network Reconfiguration and Perceptual Decoupling During an Absorptive State of Consciousness. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(7):3116-3124. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv137 PMID 26108612 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: ASMR content may help relaxation in people who experience it.

What do we know?

In two studies, ASMR videos increased pleasant affect only in people who experience ASMR, together with a lower heart rate. In another study both ASMR and nature videos lowered pulse rate compared with rest, more so for ASMR.

What don't we know?

The effect appeared only in people who experience ASMR; not everyone does. Effects were stronger with combined audiovisual content. This app does not produce ASMR content.

Wording we use in the app: ASMR is a relaxing experience for some people; not everyone experiences it.

Sources (2)
  1. Poerio ve ark. 2018 · Experiment

    In two studies, one large online and one in the lab, ASMR videos increased pleasant affect only in people who experience ASMR. In the lab study, ASMR came with a lower heart rate and higher skin conductance.

    Poerio GL, Blakey E, Hostler TJ, Veltri T. More than a feeling: Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) is characterized by reliable changes in affect and physiology. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0196645. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196645 PMID 29924796 Go to source

  2. Hozaki ve ark. 2025 · Experiment

    In two experiments, audiovisual ASMR videos produced stronger tingling than audio-only ones. Both ASMR and nature videos lowered pulse rate compared with rest, with a larger drop for ASMR.

    Hozaki D, Ezaki T, Poerio GL, Kondo HM. More relaxing than nature? The impact of ASMR content on psychological and physiological measures of parasympathetic activity. Neurosci Conscious. 2025;2025(1):niaf012. doi:10.1093/nc/niaf012 PMID 40342555 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

■ D · Insufficient evidenceFor information only

Claim reviewed: Listening to continuous pink noise through the night strengthens deep sleep and memory.

What do we know?

A meta-analysis of studies using short acoustic stimuli timed to brain waves in deep sleep (closed loop, with EEG) found a small, trend-level effect on memory consolidation (g = 0.25, p = 0.07).

What don't we know?

This app does not use EEG; continuous (open-loop) pink noise is a different method. In a 72-person study, overnight pink noise did not increase insight and shortened the first light-sleep period after sleep onset. The authors say the evidence is insufficient to recommend commercial devices.

Wording we use in the app: Pink noise can be used to mask surrounding sounds during sleep; it has not been shown to lengthen deep sleep.

Sources (2)
  1. Wunderlin ve ark. 2021 · Meta-analysis · 10 studies · 177 participants

    A meta-analysis of 10 studies (177 participants) of short acoustic stimuli timed to slow waves during deep sleep and overnight episodic memory: the combined effect was small and at trend level, significant in phase-locked subgroups. The authors say the evidence is not sufficient to recommend commercial devices.

    g = 0.25 (p = 0.07)

    Wunderlin M, Züst MA, Hertenstein E, Fehér KD, Schneider CL, Klöppel S, Nissen C. Modulating overnight memory consolidation by acoustic stimulation during slow-wave sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep. 2021;44(7):zsaa296. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa296 PMID 33406249 Go to source

  2. Vickrey ve Lerner 2023 · Experiment · 72 participants

    In 72 participants, continuous (open-loop) pink noise during sleep did not increase insight compared with silent sleep; results were closer to the wake group. Pink noise shortened the first light-sleep (N1) period just after sleep onset.

    Vickrey B, Lerner I. Overnight exposure to pink noise could jeopardize sleep-dependent insight and pattern detection. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;17:1302836. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1302836 PMID 38107593 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

✦ T · Traditional/spiritual practice

✦ T · Traditional/spiritual practice

Claim reviewed: Each Solfeggio frequency (174-963 Hz) carries a specific spiritual meaning.

A traditional or spiritual practice, not a scientific claim.

What do we know?

Medieval solfège syllables (ut, re, mi…) are real music history. Today's list assigning Hz values to them is a modern spiritual interpretation, popularized by a non-peer-reviewed book published in 1999. Lists vary between sources: some count six tones, others nine.

What don't we know?

The meanings given to the tones have not been scientifically tested, and different sources assign different meanings.

Wording we use in the app: A modern spiritual interpretation; not a scientific claim.

Sources (1)
  1. Horowitz ve Puleo 1999 · Book (not peer-reviewed)

    One of the books that spread the modern 'Solfeggio frequencies' interpretation. It is not a peer-reviewed scientific study; it is cited to show where the interpretation comes from.

    Horowitz LG, Puleo J. Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse. Tetrahedron Publishing Group; 1999. ISBN 0923550399 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

✦ T · Traditional/spiritual practice

Claim reviewed: Listening to a 7.83 Hz beat brings a person into tune with the Earth's natural frequency.

A traditional or spiritual practice, not a scientific claim.

What do we know?

Schumann resonances are electromagnetic waves excited by lightning in the cavity between the Earth's surface and the ionosphere; the fundamental peak is about 8 Hz (commonly quoted as 7.83 Hz). It is not sound and cannot be heard.

What don't we know?

There is no evidence that listening to a 7.83 Hz beat interacts with this electromagnetic phenomenon.

Wording we use in the app: This sound does not create a physical attunement with the Schumann resonance; it is offered as a listening ritual.

Sources (1)
  1. Price 2016 · Review

    Lightning excites global electromagnetic resonances (Schumann resonances) at about 8, 14 and 20 Hz in the cavity between the Earth's surface and the ionosphere. The review covers their history, theory and use in lightning research.

    Price C. ELF Electromagnetic Waves from Lightning: The Schumann Resonances. Atmosphere (Basel). 2016;7(9):116. doi:10.3390/atmos7090116 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

✦ T · Traditional/spiritual practice

Claim reviewed: Specific frequencies balance the chakras.

A traditional or spiritual practice, not a scientific claim.

What do we know?

The chakra concept comes from spiritual traditions of Indian origin. Sets that assign frequencies to chakras vary between schools; there is no agreed list. The set used in the app comes from Hans Cousto's "cosmic octave" school: mostly octave multiples of periods such as the Earth's rotation, lunar phases and orbits (e.g. the Earth day, 194.18 Hz, for the root).

What don't we know?

The effect of frequencies on chakras has not been scientifically tested. There is no evidence that transposing a period into the audible range by octaves creates any connection to that phenomenon.

Wording we use in the app: A spiritual practice from various traditions; not a scientific claim. The school behind the frequency set used is stated.

Sources (2)
  1. Cousto 1987 · Book (not peer-reviewed)

    Computes tones by transposing the frequencies of periodic phenomena such as planetary orbits, the Earth's rotation and lunar phases into the audible range by octaves (the "cosmic octave"). It is not a peer-reviewed scientific study; it is cited to show where the chakra tone set comes from.

    English translation (from the German original); Open Library record: LifeRhythm, Mendocino, 1987, 121 pages.

    Cousto H. The Cosmic Octave: Origin of Harmony; Planets, Tones, Colors; the Power of Inherent Vibrations. LifeRhythm; 1987. ISBN 0940795043 Go to source

  2. Cousto 2009 · Institutional page

    Assigns these tones to the seven chakras: 1. root 194.18 Hz (Earth day), 2. sacral 210.42 Hz (synodic Moon), 3. solar plexus 126.22 Hz (Sun tone), 4. heart 136.10 Hz (Earth year), 5. throat 141.27 Hz (Mercury), 6. brow (third eye) 221.23 Hz (Venus), 7. crown 172.06 Hz (Platonic year). Except for the Sun tone, the tones are octave multiples of the respective periods (e.g. 194.18 Hz is the 24th octave of one day); the Sun tone is computed 8 octaves below the frequency of a hypothetical orbit around the Sun.

    Planetware's tuning fork booklet (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The booklet's descriptions of effects and medical uses are not used in the product. The Earth day, synodic Moon, Earth year, Platonic year, Mercury and Venus tones were verified by recomputing them from the orbital periods (e.g. 2²⁴ / 86,400 s = 194.18 Hz).

    Cousto H. The Cosmic Octave Tuning Forks. Planetware; 2009. Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

✦ T · Traditional/spiritual practice

Claim reviewed: Certain sound protocols enable astral travel or out-of-body experiences.

A traditional or spiritual practice, not a scientific claim.

What do we know?

Out-of-body experience is a described neurological phenomenon; research links it to a failure to integrate bodily sensory information at the brain's temporo-parietal junction.

What don't we know?

There is no controlled evidence that sound leads to astral travel or that consciousness separates from the body.

Wording we use in the app: An experimental listening ritual; it makes no claim of astral travel or of consciousness leaving the body.

Sources (1)
  1. Blanke ve Arzy 2005 · Review

    Drawing on neurology, cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, the article links out-of-body experiences to a failure to integrate bodily sensory information at the brain's temporo-parietal junction.

    Blanke O, Arzy S. The out-of-body experience: disturbed self-processing at the temporo-parietal junction. Neuroscientist. 2005;11(1):16-24. doi:10.1177/1073858404270885 PMID 15632275 Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

✦ T · Traditional/spiritual practice

Claim reviewed: The Ottoman music tradition held that makams affect the mind and mood.

A traditional or spiritual practice, not a scientific claim.

What do we know?

Safi al-Din al-Urmawi's twelve modes were matched to the zodiac signs and his four branches to the four elements. Ottoman physicians such as Şuuri Hasan Efendi and Gevrekzade Hasan Efendi wrote about the effects of makams on emotions. At the Bayezid II Darüşşifa in Edirne, music is mentioned as an experimental practice alongside the traditional medicine of the period.

What don't we know?

These mappings are historical accounts: with no research showing their validity and reliability, they have no clinical value today. No specific effect of listening to a makam has been shown scientifically.

Wording we use in the app: A makam is a melodic system of Turkish music; its effect on mood is a historical account, not a scientific claim.

Sources (3)
  1. Çoban 2012 · Review

    The author, a psychiatrist and performer of classical Turkish music, reports that the link between makam and body is said to go back to al-Farabi and that Ottoman physicians such as Şuuri Hasan Efendi and Gevrekzade Hasan Efendi wrote about the effects of makams on emotions. In his view this remains historical information: with no research showing its validity and reliability, it has no clinical value today.

    A magazine article, not peer-reviewed research (Spring 2012). It contains other views on music that are not used here; only the section on the historical nature of the makam tradition (p. 69) is relied on.

    Çoban A. Hoş sedanın gücü: Müzikoterapi. SD dergisi. 2012(22):68-71. Go to source

  2. Kıranlar ve Koçak 2017 · Review

    A short note on the silhouette of the Bayezid II Darüşşifa in the Trakya University medical journal's logo. It notes that the hospital offered "experimental practices" such as music and occupation alongside the traditional medicine of the period, and that the building has presented this past as a medicine and health museum since 1997.

    A short note, not a peer-reviewed study; it gives no specific makam or time-of-day mapping.

    Kıranlar Ö, Koçak Z. A Short Note About the Reconsideration of the Image of Bayezid II Darüşşifa. Balkan Med J. 2017;34(3):187. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.3.0001 PMID 28559219 Go to source

  3. Özkan 2003 · Institutional page

    Entry "Makam": Safi al-Din al-Urmawi's Kitab al-Adwar describes twelve modes (uşşak, neva, buselik, rast, ırak, ısfahan, zirefkend, büzürg, zengule, rahevi, hüseyni, hicazi); in this system the twelve modes were matched to the twelve zodiac signs and the four branches to the four elements.

    The page gives 2003 as the print date.

    Özkan İH. Makam. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi; 2003. Go to source

Last reviewed: 3 October 2026 · Next review: 3 April 2027

Retracted sources

These publications have been retracted and are not used as evidence for any claim.